kIHDVvCoh8
CNR net Beijing on September 10 news (reporter Zhou Yifan), according to Voice of China "News" reported that amateur broke Zhou Xiao? V Chaoyang Civil Affairs hearing the case yesterday. Cause this thing is the last on December 18, Zhou Xiao? Yapeng had reported, saying alleged enrichment by public projects, in January of this year, they have publicly disclosed their sweet angel fund Yapeng alleged misappropriation of stars and corporate donations.
? Zhou Xiao questioned the existence of surgery per capita cost high, suspected transfer of benefits and other issues Smile Angel Foundation to build a charitable hospital and on January 8 and February 6,http://www.cssaus.net/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=157328&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=54047, respectively, the Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang twice to propose: Public Beijing Smile Angel Children's Hospital of the verification report and other information. Although the Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang two have accepted the request, but, Zhou Xiao? For reply is not satisfied. He said, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau to the "right to disagree publicly" refused to disclose the financial position of sweet angel Children's Hospital.
Zhou Xiao? Believes that his application for confidential business information is neither, nor a matter of personal privacy, as the Beijing Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau sweet angel registration unit in charge of the Children's Hospital, "the obligation to disclose." So this year,moncler piumini, on May 23, he filed an administrative lawsuit,air max femme pas cher, will sue the Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang court.
Trial has not yet begun, outside the courtroom, still with sunglasses Zhou Xiao?, Who had been constantly greeted with a lot of people after reading Zhou Xiao? Microblogging notice decided to go. However,tn pas cher, Zhou Xiao? V Chaoyang District, Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau's case, was placed in a gallery of only five courts, the court said the five public gallery were filed in advance of Civil Affairs, after several consultations, the plaintiffs Week Xiao? Their attorney to apply to two observer seats.
1 hour 45 minutes of the trial, the focus of controversy is that "as a sweet angel registration administrations Beijing Children's Hospital, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau whether Zhou Xiao has no obligation to publicly disclose the requested information?", Zhou Xiao said:? " an obligation. "
Zhou Xiao:? I am on January 6 this year, the Ministry of Civil Affairs reported real name on the sweet angel fund alleged huge transfer of benefits, then I January 8,basket nike pas cher, Chaoyang District, Beijing on the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau Original Smile Angel Children's Hospital Sources and registered capital verification report, I received in January 27 written responses Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau, replied that the right people do not consent to the disclosure, so this authority shall not disclose, I February 6,http://weicidu.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=669107, again,http://e-learning.tsu.ge/login/index.php?item/create_form/1, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau to apply for information disclosure.
However,http://no-yes.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=619330, the defendant attorney Kai Kan few do not agree, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau said in a statement of defense, sweet angel hospital is the information public body.
Kan little Kai: After receiving this request, we believe that the plaintiff requested information, social information, do not belong to government information,nike air max pas cher, under the law, should be voluntarily disclosed by Beijing Smile Angel Children's Hospital of information, but under the law, the civil affairs department is a sweet angel Children's Hospital's management,air max pas cher homme, if you do not take the initiative to open it, then we can request that it voluntarily disclosed. According to relevant laws, our February 24, 2014,moncler milano, on the Beijing Children's Hospital sweet angel sent information disclosure this book, sweet angel require Beijing Children's Hospital disclosed plaintiff requested information. And more than that, we have a total of six publicly request it.
Trial, the plaintiff Zhou Xiao? During the defendant stated, repeatedly shook his head to express their disapproval. He believes that when the Smile Angel Children's Hospital during the inspection, the Civil Affairs Bureau would like to submit necessarily require the disclosure of information which own content, therefore, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau is to master these information needs to be disclosed.
Zhou Xiao:? According to the provisions of Article clear "Open Government Information", the so-called administrative organs of government information refers to information produced or acquired in the course of performing government duties, that the executive acquired in the course of performing the administrative duties of Information also is government information, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau is sweet angel hospital registration and management agency, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, such as "private non-enterprise annual inspection measures",http://bloggingmetablog.com/forum/profile/njdgr32qmfy,peuterey outlet milano, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau should conduct annual Children's Hospital sweet angel, inspection you need to provide relevant information. That information becomes Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau of government information.
Thus, the trial there was a small episode: Both sides sweet angel Children's Hospital was established exactly which day debate. Because according to "private non-enterprise units annual inspection measures",air max pas cher, as of last year December 31, established the time of registration is not more than six months of private non-enterprise units,abercrombie outlet online, do not participate in that year's annual inspection. So Zhou Xiao? In information disclosure requirements, they simply have not received annual reports submitted by the Children's Hospital sweet angel.
Defendant: sweet angel Established Children's Hospital,http://cytronic.ca/forum/profile.php?id=97202, the opening time is July 1,http://bbs.maifun.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=55177, 2012, so that it is tantamount to the annual combined 12 year and 13 year together.
The presiding judge: July 1, 2012 What time?
Defendant: Opened point in time.
The presiding judge: that the starting point of your annual legal from what time?
Defendant: the starting point should be the legal founding of.
The presiding judge: that when the hospital was established?
Defendant: Founded in 2012, June 28.
The difference between two days, it directly determines the sweet angel Children's Hospital can actually be 2012's annual report and the 2013 merger submitted, it decided, the Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang whether there is relevant information.
However,abercrombie outlet milano, in Beijing hosted by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs community organization of public service platform,http://www.gameinatrix.com/index.php?option=com_community&view=profile&userid=3282,air max femme pas cher, clearly indicates that sweet angel Children's Hospital at June 28, 2012 was established, and has passed the 2012 annual inspection.
Plaintiff attorney Ren Jiahui: So the defendant said the second half of 2012 and 2013 together inspection, this situation is not true, it is impossible not received annual material, if it is not received on the case of the inspection of materials make the conclusion of the 2012 annual pass, then certainly it is illegal.
Court did not in court for sentencing. Zhou Xiao? Say, sweet angel Children's Hospital official website has never disclosed his application information, Chaoyang District Civil Affairs Bureau said public information is not disclosed the contents of his requirements, such as the audit report is only the audit conclusion, donation detailed information is not released . He said that even losing, he will continue to require sweet angel Children's Hospital and examined the relevant departments and public sources of contributions and expenditures details and other information.
(Original title: Zhou Xiao v Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang court case is not in court for sentencing?)
